The verdict
Tevita Naufahu has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Naufahu leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonTevita Naufahu18%of decided measures9measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 13 for Tevita Naufahu, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Tevita Naufahu |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.10Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 0.9Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.77Better | 0.24 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.38Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.08 | 0.19Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.0 | 14.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.8Better | 84.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 112.8Better | 87.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.0Better | 26.1 |
| Runs per Game | 10.9Better | 10.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.96Better | 8.44 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.48Better | 8.22 |
| Tackles per Game | 2.1 | 9.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.4 | 81.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19 | 0.17Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.5Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 13.2Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Games played | 13 | 21 |