The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonTevita Naufahu10%of decided measures11measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 13 for Tevita Naufahu, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Tevita Naufahu |  Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.23 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.08Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.77Better | 0.61 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.38Better | 3.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.08 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.0 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 108.8 | 137.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 112.8 | 137.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.0 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.9 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.96Better | 9.37 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.48Better | 8.65 |
| Tackles per Game | 2.1 | 5.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.4Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19Better | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 13.2 | 18.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 13 | 18 |