The verdict
Tanah Boyd has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tanah Boyd leads by 79%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonTanah Boyd79%of decided measures2measures wonZane Harrison
Games played: 10 for Tanah Boyd, 15 for Zane Harrison. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Tanah Boyd |  Zane Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.30Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 1.00Better | 0.40 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.00Better | 0.53 |
| Points per Game | 9.2Better | 0.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30Better | 0.07 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.10Better | 0.33 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20Better | 0.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 57.8Better | 36.1 |
| Passes per Game | 37.2Better | 26.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 47.2Better | 29.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 621.5Better | 239.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 13.6Better | 7.7 |
| Runs per Game | 5.7Better | 4.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.28Better | 6.67 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 17.3Better | 16.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.1 | 83.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 67.4 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 81.8 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 14.9Better | 5.9 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 574.5Better | 210.4 |
| Games played | 10 | 15 |