The verdict
Tom Dearden has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tom Dearden leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonTanah Boyd16%of decided measures11measures wonTom Dearden
Games played: 10 for Tanah Boyd, 13 for Tom Dearden. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Tanah Boyd |  Tom Dearden |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.30Better | 0.15 |
| Try Assists per Game | 1.00 | 1.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.00 | 1.31Better |
| Points per Game | 9.2Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30 | 0.46Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.10 | 2.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20Better | 0.15 |
| Possessions per Game | 57.8Better | 54.7 |
| Passes per Game | 37.2 | 43.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 47.2 | 86.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 621.5Better | 254.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 13.6 | 24.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 5.7 | 10.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.28Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 17.3 | 22.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.1 | 86.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 67.4 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 81.8 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 14.9Better | 5.6 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 574.5Better | 168.9 |
| Games played | 10 | 13 |