2026 NRL player comparison

Sione KatoavsZac Laybutt

Sharks · Wing versus Cowboys · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Sione Katoa has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Sione Katoa leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonSione Katoa33%of decided measures7measures wonZac Laybutt

Games played: 18 for Sione Katoa, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoSione KatoaCowboys logoZac Laybutt
Tries per Game0.89Better0.10
Try Assists per Game0.000.10Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.060.29Better
Points per Game3.6Better0.4
Line Breaks per Game1.06Better0.24
Tackle Breaks per Game5.44Better1.05
Offloads per Game0.44Better0.19
Possessions per Game20.6Better14.6
Passes per Game1.34.2Better
Run Metres per Game156.2Better84.0
Metres Gained per Game159.1Better87.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game51.8Better26.1
Runs per Game18.4Better10.0
Metres per Run8.47Better8.44
Metres per Hit-Up8.068.22Better
Tackles per Game1.79.5Better
Tackle Efficiency63.881.6Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.430.17Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.070.07
Kick Returns per Game2.1Better0.7
Kick Return Metres per Game20.0Better6.5
Bombs Caught per Game0.9Better0.3
Games played1821