The verdict
Tom Dearden has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tom Dearden leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonSam Walker16%of decided measures11measures wonTom Dearden
Games played: 21 for Sam Walker, 13 for Tom Dearden. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Sam Walker |  Tom Dearden |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.48Better | 0.15 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.90 | 1.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.00 | 1.31Better |
| Points per Game | 9.3Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29 | 0.46Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.38 | 2.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.05Better | 0.15 |
| Possessions per Game | 60.2Better | 54.7 |
| Passes per Game | 45.2Better | 43.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 76.7 | 86.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 289.4Better | 254.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 15.9 | 24.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.0 | 10.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.67 | 8.17Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0 | 22.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.0 | 86.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 71.4 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 77.8 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kicks per Game | 8.7Better | 5.6 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 212.9Better | 168.9 |
| Games played | 21 | 13 |