The verdict
Sam Tuivaiti has the edge
Across 15 rate and efficiency measures, Sam Tuivaiti leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonSam Tuivaiti20%of decided measures6measures wonTaylor Losalu
Games played: 15 for Sam Tuivaiti, 7 for Taylor Losalu. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Sam Tuivaiti |  Taylor Losalu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53Better | 0.29 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.13 | 0.14Better |
| Possessions per Game | 10.1Better | 2.4 |
| Passes per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 75.2Better | 22.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.2Better | 22.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 25.4Better | 9.3 |
| Runs per Game | 9.7Better | 2.1 |
| Metres per Run | 7.78 | 10.33Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.23 | 8.36Better |
| Tackles per Game | 23.0Better | 5.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.0 | 92.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.12 |
| Games played | 15 | 7 |