The verdict
Roger Tuivasa-Sheck has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck36%of decided measures7measures wonValentine Holmes
Games played: 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck, 24 for Valentine Holmes. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Roger Tuivasa-Sheck |  Valentine Holmes |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20 | 0.42Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.50Better | 0.33 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.40Better | 0.38 |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 6.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.40 | 0.63Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.10Better | 2.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.30 | 0.88Better |
| Possessions per Game | 20.8Better | 18.4 |
| Passes per Game | 4.9Better | 3.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 139.7Better | 120.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 144.7Better | 120.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.7Better | 38.0 |
| Runs per Game | 15.3Better | 13.1 |
| Metres per Run | 9.13 | 9.16Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.75 | 8.28Better |
| Tackles per Game | 6.0 | 12.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 75.0Better | 71.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.25Better | 0.30 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 100.0Better | 74.6 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.1Better | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 10 | 24 |