The verdict
Tevita Naufahu has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Naufahu leads by 62%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonRex Bassingthwaite62%of decided measures17measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 9 for Rex Bassingthwaite, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Rex Bassingthwaite |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.11 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.22 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Possessions per Game | 4.0 | 13.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.4 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 25.4 | 108.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 25.4 | 112.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 7.7 | 34.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 3.2 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.90 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 3.90 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 2.0 | 2.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.8Better | 79.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.19 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.7 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 6.0 | 13.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 9 | 13 |