The verdict
Reece Robson has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Reece Robson leads by 80%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
18measures wonReece Robson80%of decided measures2measures wonSamuel Healey
Games played: 19 for Reece Robson, 22 for Samuel Healey. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Reece Robson |  Samuel Healey |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.16Better | 0.09 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.21Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.16Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.21Better | 0.18 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.16 | 1.32Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32Better | 0.23 |
| Possessions per Game | 102.2Better | 32.7 |
| Passes per Game | 96.9Better | 29.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 56.1Better | 35.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 58.6Better | 36.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 16.7Better | 11.3 |
| Runs per Game | 5.6Better | 3.7 |
| Metres per Run | 9.96Better | 9.60 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | 9.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 42.9Better | 11.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.7Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.01 |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 4.5Better | 3.0 |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 44.3Better | 28.4 |
| Games played | 19 | 22 |