2026 NRL player comparison

Phoenix CrosslandvsWayde Egan

Knights · Hooker versus Warriors · Hooker

Compare another player

The verdict

Wayde Egan has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Wayde Egan leads by 67%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

3measures wonPhoenix Crossland67%of decided measures15measures wonWayde Egan

Games played: 22 for Phoenix Crossland, 23 for Wayde Egan. Compared positions: Hooker.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoPhoenix CrosslandWarriors logoWayde Egan
Tries per Game0.14Better0.13
Try Assists per Game0.050.48Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.090.65Better
Points per Game0.50.5
Line Breaks per Game0.050.26Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.140.43Better
Offloads per Game0.050.52Better
Possessions per Game77.498.7Better
Passes per Game74.994.4Better
Run Metres per Game11.652.1Better
Metres Gained per Game53.054.5Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game2.311.2Better
Runs per Game1.45.5Better
Metres per Run8.509.52Better
Metres per Hit-Up5.00
Tackles per Game44.1Better31.2
Tackle Efficiency91.791.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.06Better0.07
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.000.00
Dummy-Half Runs per Game0.44.8Better
Dummy-Half Metres per Game3.846.7Better
Games played2223