The verdict
Tallyn Da Silva has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Tallyn Da Silva leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonPhoenix Crossland50%of decided measures15measures wonTallyn Da Silva
Games played: 22 for Phoenix Crossland, 24 for Tallyn Da Silva. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Phoenix Crossland |  Tallyn Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14 | 0.50Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.13Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.09 | 0.21Better |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 2.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.05 | 0.33Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.14 | 0.92Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.05 | 0.38Better |
| Possessions per Game | 77.4 | 83.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 74.9 | 79.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 11.6 | 38.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 53.0Better | 42.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 2.3 | 10.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 1.4 | 3.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.50 | 10.12Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 5.00 | – |
| Tackles per Game | 44.1Better | 29.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.7Better | 87.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.12 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 80.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.01 |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 0.4 | 2.8Better |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 3.8 | 26.5Better |
| Games played | 22 | 24 |