The verdict
Paul Alamoti has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Paul Alamoti leads by 62%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonPaul Alamoti62%of decided measures4measures wonTommy Talau
Games played: 21 for Paul Alamoti, 14 for Tommy Talau. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Paul Alamoti |  Tommy Talau |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.19Better | 0.07 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14Better | 0.07 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 2.0Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52Better | 0.21 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.19Better | 1.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.29Better | 0.07 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0Better | 6.9 |
| Passes per Game | 3.0Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 129.8Better | 45.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 132.0Better | 45.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 48.7Better | 14.0 |
| Runs per Game | 13.8Better | 4.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.40Better | 9.26 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.25Better | 7.75 |
| Tackles per Game | 13.0Better | 3.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9 | 84.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.09Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 86.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06Better | 0.07 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5 | 0.8Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 21 | 14 |