The verdict
Tallis Duncan has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Tallis Duncan leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonPaul Alamoti14%of decided measures12measures wonTallis Duncan
Games played: 21 for Paul Alamoti, 21 for Tallis Duncan. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Paul Alamoti |  Tallis Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.19 | 0.57Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.38Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33 | 0.57Better |
| Points per Game | 2.0 | 2.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52 | 0.76Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.19Better | 2.48 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.29Better | 0.90 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0 | 18.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0 | 3.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 129.8Better | 125.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 132.0Better | 125.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 48.7Better | 46.5 |
| Runs per Game | 13.8 | 14.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.40Better | 8.78 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.25Better | 8.31 |
| Tackles per Game | 13.0 | 24.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9 | 87.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 86.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 21 | 21 |