The verdict
Robert Toia has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Robert Toia leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonPaul Alamoti20%of decided measures12measures wonRobert Toia
Games played: 21 for Paul Alamoti, 20 for Robert Toia. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Paul Alamoti |  Robert Toia |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.19 | 0.60Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.60Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33 | 0.40Better |
| Points per Game | 2.0 | 2.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52 | 0.70Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.19 | 4.25Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.29Better | 0.60 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0Better | 16.7 |
| Passes per Game | 3.0 | 5.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 129.8Better | 104.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 132.0Better | 104.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 48.7Better | 43.4 |
| Runs per Game | 13.8Better | 10.8 |
| Metres per Run | 9.40 | 9.66Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.25Better | 8.07 |
| Tackles per Game | 13.0 | 20.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9 | 83.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.12Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 86.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Games played | 21 | 20 |