The verdict
Paul Alamoti has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Paul Alamoti leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonPaul Alamoti5%of decided measures10measures wonReuben Garrick
Games played: 21 for Paul Alamoti, 23 for Reuben Garrick. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Paul Alamoti |  Reuben Garrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.19 | 0.48Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.30 |
| Points per Game | 2.0 | 4.1Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52Better | 0.43 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.19Better | 1.83 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.29 | 2.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0 | 20.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0 | 4.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 129.8Better | 128.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 132.0 | 133.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 48.7Better | 39.2 |
| Runs per Game | 13.8 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.40Better | 8.74 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.25Better | 7.52 |
| Tackles per Game | 13.0Better | 12.2 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9 | 81.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.17Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 86.7Better | 73.3 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 21 | 23 |