The verdict
Noah Martin has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Noah Martin leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonNoah Martin44%of decided measures5measures wonShawn Blore
Games played: 11 for Noah Martin, 14 for Shawn Blore. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Noah Martin |  Shawn Blore |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.07Better |
| Points per Game | 1.5Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.55Better | 0.07 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.18Better | 0.64 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.18 | 0.36Better |
| Possessions per Game | 10.6Better | 7.7 |
| Passes per Game | 2.3Better | 0.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 70.0Better | 58.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 70.0Better | 58.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 26.8Better | 20.6 |
| Runs per Game | 8.1Better | 6.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.65Better | 8.46 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.80 | 8.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 39.6Better | 17.2 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.6Better | 89.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Games played | 11 | 14 |