The verdict
Nick Meaney has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Nick Meaney leads by 90%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
20measures wonNick Meaney90%of decided measures1measures wonRiley Jones
Games played: 20 for Nick Meaney, 7 for Riley Jones. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Nick Meaney |  Riley Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 7.6Better | 0.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.40Better | 0.14 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.05Better | 0.29 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 16.5Better | 3.6 |
| Passes per Game | 3.8Better | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 92.4Better | 14.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 93.4Better | 14.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.3Better | 5.3 |
| Runs per Game | 11.8Better | 2.1 |
| Metres per Run | 7.86Better | 6.73 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.64 | 8.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4Better | 2.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2Better | 73.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16Better | 0.35 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 81.1 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.1 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 20 | 7 |