The verdict
Nick Meaney has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Nick Meaney leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonNick Meaney37%of decided measures6measures wonPatrick Herbert
Games played: 20 for Nick Meaney, 14 for Patrick Herbert. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Nick Meaney |  Patrick Herbert |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25Better | 0.07 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.50Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.50Better |
| Points per Game | 7.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.40Better | 0.21 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.05Better | 1.79 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.80Better | 0.43 |
| Possessions per Game | 16.5Better | 13.9 |
| Passes per Game | 3.8Better | 3.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 92.4Better | 87.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 93.4Better | 87.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.3 | 30.3 |
| Runs per Game | 11.8Better | 10.1 |
| Metres per Run | 7.86 | 8.70Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.64 | 8.27Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4Better | 12.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.2 | 82.0Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 81.1 | 100.0Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.0 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 20 | 14 |