The verdict
Naufahu Whyte has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Naufahu Whyte leads by 41%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonNaufahu Whyte41%of decided measures5measures wonThomas Flegler
Games played: 23 for Naufahu Whyte, 19 for Thomas Flegler. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Naufahu Whyte |  Thomas Flegler |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.11Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.09 | 0.11Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.87Better | 1.26 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.13Better | 0.63 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.8Better | 9.1 |
| Passes per Game | 1.7Better | 0.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.7Better | 69.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 162.7Better | 69.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 70.6Better | 25.1 |
| Runs per Game | 16.1Better | 7.8 |
| Metres per Run | 10.12Better | 8.83 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.37Better | 8.46 |
| Tackles per Game | 25.7Better | 20.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.8 | 94.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 23 | 19 |