The verdict
Moses Leota has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Moses Leota leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
19measures wonMoses Leota100%of decided measures0measures wonSimione Laiafi
Games played: 24 for Moses Leota, 18 for Simione Laiafi. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Moses Leota |  Simione Laiafi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.08Better | 0.44 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.63Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.8Better | 5.4 |
| Passes per Game | 2.5Better | 0.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 97.9Better | 42.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.7Better | 42.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.3Better | 15.6 |
| Runs per Game | 10.9Better | 5.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.97Better | 8.32 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.69Better | 7.94 |
| Tackles per Game | 25.0Better | 11.9 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.3Better | 88.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 24 | 18 |