The verdict
Moses Leota has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Moses Leota leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonMoses Leota37%of decided measures6measures wonSam Hughes
Games played: 24 for Moses Leota, 8 for Sam Hughes. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.13Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.13Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.08Better | 0.63 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.63Better | 0.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.8Better | 8.9 |
| Passes per Game | 2.5Better | 0.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 97.9Better | 65.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.7Better | 65.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.3Better | 27.5 |
| Runs per Game | 10.9Better | 8.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.97Better | 8.20 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.69Better | 8.37 |
| Tackles per Game | 25.0Better | 19.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.3 | 95.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.03Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 24 | 8 |