The verdict
Payne Haas has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Payne Haas leads by 68%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonMoses Leota68%of decided measures16measures wonPayne Haas
Games played: 24 for Moses Leota, 17 for Payne Haas. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Moses Leota |  Payne Haas |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.18Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.04Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.24Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.08 | 4.47Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.63 | 1.53Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.8 | 16.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.5Better | 2.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 97.9 | 146.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.7 | 146.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.3 | 62.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.9 | 14.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.97 | 9.92Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.69 | 9.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 25.0 | 37.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.3 | 95.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.02Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 24 | 17 |