The verdict
Mitchell Barnett has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonMitchell Barnett33%of decided measures6measures wonXavier Willison
Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 24 for Xavier Willison. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Mitchell Barnett |  Xavier Willison |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.07 | 0.29Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.3 | 1.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.07 | 0.17Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.87Better | 1.83 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.53Better | 0.46 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.5Better | 14.8 |
| Passes per Game | 2.7Better | 0.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 149.0Better | 115.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 149.5Better | 116.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.7Better | 48.8 |
| Runs per Game | 16.9Better | 13.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.83Better | 8.74 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.61 | 8.62Better |
| Tackles per Game | 27.3 | 32.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.5 | 91.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 15 | 24 |