The verdict
Tino Fa'asuamaleaui has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tino Fa'asuamaleaui leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonMitchell Barnett16%of decided measures11measures wonTino Fa'asuamaleaui
Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 21 for Tino Fa'asuamaleaui. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Mitchell Barnett |  Tino Fa'asuamaleaui |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.07 | 0.10Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.29Better |
| Points per Game | 0.3 | 0.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.07 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.87 | 2.57Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.53 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.5 | 19.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.7 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 149.0Better | 140.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 149.5Better | 140.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.7 | 56.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 16.9Better | 16.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.83Better | 8.78 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.61 | 9.12Better |
| Tackles per Game | 27.3 | 33.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.5Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 15 | 21 |