2026 NRL player comparison

Mitchell BarnettvsTevita Tatola

Warriors · Prop versus Rabbitohs · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Mitchell Barnett has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 65%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonMitchell Barnett65%of decided measures3measures wonTevita Tatola

Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 24 for Tevita Tatola. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoMitchell BarnettRabbitohs logoTevita Tatola
Tries per Game0.070.08Better
Try Assists per Game0.20Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.13Better0.00
Points per Game0.30.3
Line Breaks per Game0.07Better0.04
Tackle Breaks per Game1.87Better0.42
Offloads per Game0.53Better0.04
Possessions per Game19.5Better14.2
Passes per Game2.7Better1.1
Run Metres per Game149.0Better106.8
Metres Gained per Game149.5Better106.8
Post-Contact Metres per Game52.7Better39.4
Runs per Game16.9Better12.8
Metres per Run8.83Better8.35
Metres per Hit-Up8.61Better8.05
Tackles per Game27.3Better26.7
Tackle Efficiency90.591.6Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.060.05Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Games played1524