The verdict
Matt Timoko has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Timoko leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonMatt Timoko43%of decided measures6measures wonNick Meaney
Games played: 20 for Matt Timoko, 20 for Nick Meaney. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Matt Timoko |  Nick Meaney |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.30Better | 0.25 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.15Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 1.2 | 7.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.40 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.05Better | 2.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.15Better | 0.80 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.1Better | 16.5 |
| Passes per Game | 3.3 | 3.8Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 140.8Better | 92.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 141.0Better | 93.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.0Better | 30.3 |
| Runs per Game | 15.0Better | 11.8 |
| Metres per Run | 9.38Better | 7.86 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.62Better | 7.64 |
| Tackles per Game | 10.7 | 12.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.2Better | 80.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.14Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 81.1 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 20 | 20 |