The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonMatt Burton16%of decided measures8measures wonTom Chester
Games played: 23 for Matt Burton, 23 for Tom Chester. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Matt Burton |  Tom Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.39 | 0.48Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.35Better | 0.09 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.61Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 1.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.57 | 0.87Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.96 | 3.39Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.61Better | 0.52 |
| Possessions per Game | 36.7Better | 20.7 |
| Passes per Game | 19.2Better | 4.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 122.3 | 158.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 310.9Better | 160.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.3 | 58.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.0 | 16.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.44 | 9.92Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0Better | 14.5 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.4Better | 76.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.23 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 79.2 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 23 | 23 |