The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonMatt Burton18%of decided measures9measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 23 for Matt Burton, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Matt Burton |  Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.39Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.35Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.61Better | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 2.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.57Better | 0.52 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.96 | 3.19Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.61 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 36.7Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 19.2Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 122.3 | 129.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 310.9Better | 132.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.3 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.0 | 13.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.44Better | 9.40 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0Better | 13.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.4Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 79.2 | 86.7Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 23 | 21 |