The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 62%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonMatt Burton62%of decided measures4measures wonPatrick Herbert
Games played: 23 for Matt Burton, 14 for Patrick Herbert. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Matt Burton |  Patrick Herbert |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.39Better | 0.07 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.35 | 0.50Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.61Better | 0.50 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.57Better | 0.21 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.96Better | 1.79 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.61Better | 0.43 |
| Possessions per Game | 36.7Better | 13.9 |
| Passes per Game | 19.2Better | 3.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 122.3Better | 87.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 310.9Better | 87.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.3Better | 30.3 |
| Runs per Game | 13.0Better | 10.1 |
| Metres per Run | 9.44Better | 8.70 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 8.27Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0Better | 12.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.4 | 82.0Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 79.2 | 100.0Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 23 | 14 |