The verdict
Mat Feagai has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Mat Feagai leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonMat Feagai43%of decided measures6measures wonRex Bassingthwaite
Games played: 19 for Mat Feagai, 9 for Rex Bassingthwaite. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Mat Feagai |  Rex Bassingthwaite |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.26 | 0.33Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.1 | 1.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.47Better | 0.11 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.05Better | 0.22 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.37Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.6Better | 4.0 |
| Passes per Game | 2.1Better | 0.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 99.3Better | 25.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 100.5Better | 25.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 34.4Better | 7.7 |
| Runs per Game | 11.1Better | 3.2 |
| Metres per Run | 8.94Better | 7.90 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.41Better | 3.90 |
| Tackles per Game | 7.0Better | 2.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 76.4 | 81.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.23 | 0.11Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.6 | 0.7Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 5.9 | 6.0Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.3Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 19 | 9 |