The verdict
Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 64%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
18measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase64%of decided measures4measures wonZac Laybutt
Games played: 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase, 21 for Zac Laybutt. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Mark Nawaqanitawase |  Zac Laybutt |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.79Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.32Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.32Better | 0.29 |
| Points per Game | 3.2Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.74Better | 0.24 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.21Better | 1.05 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.21Better | 0.19 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.6Better | 14.6 |
| Passes per Game | 2.5 | 4.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 157.8Better | 84.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 162.2Better | 87.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 60.8Better | 26.1 |
| Runs per Game | 16.4Better | 10.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.61Better | 8.44 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.72 | 8.22Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.6 | 9.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.5Better | 81.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.14Better | 0.17 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.11 | 0.07Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 3.1Better | 0.7 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 34.9Better | 6.5 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.3Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 19 | 21 |