The verdict
Zane Harrison has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zane Harrison leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonLuke Metcalf37%of decided measures13measures wonZane Harrison
Games played: 10 for Luke Metcalf, 15 for Zane Harrison. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Luke Metcalf |  Zane Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.40Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.53Better |
| Points per Game | 2.0Better | 0.1 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10Better | 0.07 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.50Better | 0.33 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.13Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.5 | 36.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 8.8 | 26.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 19.3 | 29.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 113.1 | 239.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 4.7 | 7.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 2.1 | 4.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.19Better | 6.67 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 5.8 | 16.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6Better | 83.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 75.0 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Kicks per Game | 2.8 | 5.9Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 94.0 | 210.4Better |
| Games played | 10 | 15 |