The verdict
Luke Metcalf has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Luke Metcalf leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonLuke Metcalf47%of decided measures5measures wonToby Rodwell
Games played: 10 for Luke Metcalf, 5 for Toby Rodwell. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Luke Metcalf |  Toby Rodwell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Points per Game | 2.0Better | 1.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10 | 0.20Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.50 | 0.80Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.20Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.5Better | 10.0 |
| Passes per Game | 8.8Better | 5.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 19.3Better | 16.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 113.1Better | 85.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 4.7 | 7.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 2.1Better | 2.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.19Better | 8.00 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 5.8 | 7.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6Better | 83.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 75.0Better | 40.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.12 |
| Kicks per Game | 2.8Better | 1.6 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 94.0Better | 69.4 |
| Games played | 10 | 5 |