2026 NRL player comparison

Luke MetcalfvsTe Maire Martin

Warriors · Halfback versus Warriors · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Te Maire Martin has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Te Maire Martin leads by 68%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

3measures wonLuke Metcalf68%of decided measures16measures wonTe Maire Martin

Games played: 10 for Luke Metcalf, 11 for Te Maire Martin. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoLuke MetcalfWarriors logoTe Maire Martin
Tries per Game0.200.55Better
Try Assists per Game0.101.09Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.201.36Better
Points per Game2.02.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.100.73Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.502.82Better
Offloads per Game0.001.00Better
Possessions per Game13.554.2Better
Passes per Game8.838.9Better
Run Metres per Game19.382.8Better
Metres Gained per Game113.1315.0Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game4.724.5Better
Runs per Game2.110.5Better
Metres per Run9.19Better7.85
Metres per Hit-Up
Tackles per Game5.822.3Better
Tackle Efficiency86.6Better83.6
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.10Better0.13
Conversion Accuracy75.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Kicks per Game2.87.8Better
Kick Metres per Game94.0232.1Better
Games played1011