The verdict
Nathan Cleary has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Nathan Cleary leads by 71%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonLuke Metcalf71%of decided measures18measures wonNathan Cleary
Games played: 10 for Luke Metcalf, 21 for Nathan Cleary. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Luke Metcalf |  Nathan Cleary |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20 | 0.29Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 1.29Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 1.24Better |
| Points per Game | 2.0 | 10.1Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10 | 0.71Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.50 | 2.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 1.05Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.5 | 63.5Better |
| Passes per Game | 8.8 | 38.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 19.3 | 81.6Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 113.1 | 681.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 4.7 | 24.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 2.1 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.19Better | 7.52 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 5.8 | 20.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6Better | 81.1 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.17 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 75.0 | 83.3Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Kicks per Game | 2.8 | 17.1Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 94.0 | 599.5Better |
| Games played | 10 | 21 |