The verdict
Lindsay Smith has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Lindsay Smith leads by 68%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonLindsay Smith68%of decided measures3measures wonVictor Radley
Games played: 24 for Lindsay Smith, 16 for Victor Radley. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Lindsay Smith |  Victor Radley |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13Better | 0.06 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.13 |
| Points per Game | 0.5Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.00Better | 0.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.71Better | 0.06 |
| Possessions per Game | 20.4Better | 20.3 |
| Passes per Game | 9.5 | 11.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 87.2Better | 78.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 88.0Better | 80.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 29.2Better | 27.4 |
| Runs per Game | 11.2Better | 9.8 |
| Metres per Run | 7.81 | 8.02Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.60 | 8.35Better |
| Tackles per Game | 34.3Better | 31.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.2Better | 87.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.03Better | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.03 |
| Games played | 24 | 16 |