The verdict
Valentine Holmes has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Valentine Holmes leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonLeka Halasima33%of decided measures14measures wonValentine Holmes
Games played: 20 for Leka Halasima, 24 for Valentine Holmes. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Leka Halasima |  Valentine Holmes |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40 | 0.42Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.33Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.38Better |
| Points per Game | 1.6 | 6.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.35 | 0.63Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.60Better | 2.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 0.88Better |
| Possessions per Game | 11.9 | 18.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.3 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.8 | 120.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 90.8 | 120.4Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.7 | 38.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.8 | 13.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.31Better | 9.16 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.82Better | 8.28 |
| Tackles per Game | 18.1Better | 12.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.4Better | 71.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16Better | 0.30 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 74.6 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.07Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 20 | 24 |