2026 NRL player comparison

Leka HalasimavsRoger Tuivasa-Sheck

Warriors · Centre versus Warriors · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Roger Tuivasa-Sheck has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

8measures wonLeka Halasima20%of decided measures12measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck

Games played: 20 for Leka Halasima, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoLeka HalasimaWarriors logoRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Tries per Game0.40Better0.20
Try Assists per Game0.100.50Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.150.40Better
Points per Game1.6Better1.0
Line Breaks per Game0.350.40Better
Tackle Breaks per Game3.60Better2.10
Offloads per Game0.200.30Better
Possessions per Game11.920.8Better
Passes per Game1.34.9Better
Run Metres per Game90.8139.7Better
Metres Gained per Game90.8144.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game37.746.7Better
Runs per Game9.815.3Better
Metres per Run9.31Better9.13
Metres per Hit-Up8.82Better7.75
Tackles per Game18.1Better6.0
Tackle Efficiency83.4Better75.0
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.16Better0.25
Conversion Accuracy100.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.080.06Better
Kick Returns per Game0.21.1Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.20.2
Games played2010