The verdict
Leka Halasima has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Leka Halasima leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonLeka Halasima30%of decided measures7measures wonPatrick Herbert
Games played: 20 for Leka Halasima, 14 for Patrick Herbert. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Leka Halasima |  Patrick Herbert |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40Better | 0.07 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.50Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.50Better |
| Points per Game | 1.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.35Better | 0.21 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.60Better | 1.79 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 0.43Better |
| Possessions per Game | 11.9 | 13.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.3 | 3.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.8Better | 87.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 90.8Better | 87.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.7Better | 30.3 |
| Runs per Game | 9.8 | 10.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.31Better | 8.70 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.82Better | 8.27 |
| Tackles per Game | 18.1Better | 12.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.4Better | 82.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 20 | 14 |