2026 NRL player comparison

Leka HalasimavsMawene Hiroti

Warriors · Centre versus Sharks · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Leka Halasima has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Leka Halasima leads by 60%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

16measures wonLeka Halasima60%of decided measures4measures wonMawene Hiroti

Games played: 20 for Leka Halasima, 19 for Mawene Hiroti. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoLeka HalasimaSharks logoMawene Hiroti
Tries per Game0.40Better0.11
Try Assists per Game0.10Better0.05
Line Break Assists per Game0.15Better0.05
Points per Game1.6Better0.5
Line Breaks per Game0.35Better0.16
Tackle Breaks per Game3.60Better1.21
Offloads per Game0.20Better0.05
Possessions per Game11.9Better8.9
Passes per Game1.3Better0.5
Run Metres per Game90.8Better69.1
Metres Gained per Game90.8Better69.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game37.7Better24.4
Runs per Game9.8Better7.7
Metres per Run9.31Better8.93
Metres per Hit-Up8.829.09Better
Tackles per Game18.1Better9.0
Tackle Efficiency83.484.7Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.160.15Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.080.06Better
Kick Returns per Game0.20.2
Bombs Caught per Game0.2Better0.1
Games played2019