The verdict
Latrell Mitchell has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Latrell Mitchell leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonLatrell Mitchell52%of decided measures5measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Games played: 11 for Latrell Mitchell, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Latrell Mitchell |  Roger Tuivasa-Sheck |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 1.09Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.50 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.64Better | 0.40 |
| Points per Game | 12.0Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.00Better | 0.40 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00Better | 2.10 |
| Offloads per Game | 2.27Better | 0.30 |
| Possessions per Game | 26.6Better | 20.8 |
| Passes per Game | 10.9Better | 4.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.4 | 139.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 285.5Better | 144.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 38.2 | 46.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.3 | 15.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.74Better | 9.13 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.76Better | 7.75 |
| Tackles per Game | 8.5Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.5Better | 75.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.12Better | 0.25 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.7 | 100.0Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 80.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 1.1Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 11 | 10 |