The verdict
Latrell Mitchell has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Latrell Mitchell leads by 43%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
15measures wonLatrell Mitchell43%of decided measures6measures wonLuke Garner
Games played: 11 for Latrell Mitchell, 18 for Luke Garner. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Latrell Mitchell |  Luke Garner |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 1.09Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.64Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 12.0Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.00Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00Better | 1.28 |
| Offloads per Game | 2.27Better | 0.28 |
| Possessions per Game | 26.6Better | 8.9 |
| Passes per Game | 10.9Better | 1.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.4Better | 65.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 285.5Better | 67.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 38.2Better | 26.6 |
| Runs per Game | 10.3Better | 7.3 |
| Metres per Run | 10.74Better | 9.02 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.76 | 9.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 8.5 | 20.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.5 | 89.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.12 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 80.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 11 | 18 |