2026 NRL player comparison

Kyle FlanaganvsTanah Boyd

Dragons · Halfback versus Warriors · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Tanah Boyd has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Tanah Boyd leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonKyle Flanagan50%of decided measures15measures wonTanah Boyd

Games played: 23 for Kyle Flanagan, 10 for Tanah Boyd. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoKyle FlanaganWarriors logoTanah Boyd
Tries per Game0.040.30Better
Try Assists per Game0.301.00Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.221.00Better
Points per Game0.69.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.040.30Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.351.10Better
Offloads per Game0.090.20Better
Possessions per Game45.157.8Better
Passes per Game37.237.2
Run Metres per Game28.547.2Better
Metres Gained per Game186.4621.5Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.113.6Better
Runs per Game4.15.7Better
Metres per Run6.898.28Better
Metres per Hit-Up
Tackles per Game18.3Better17.3
Tackle Efficiency90.1Better80.1
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.08Better0.19
Conversion Accuracy80.0Better67.4
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0Better81.8
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Kicks per Game4.514.9Better
Kick Metres per Game157.9574.5Better
Games played2310