2026 NRL player comparison

Kyle FlanaganvsSandon Smith

Dragons · Halfback versus Knights · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Sandon Smith has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Sandon Smith leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonKyle Flanagan50%of decided measures15measures wonSandon Smith

Games played: 23 for Kyle Flanagan, 23 for Sandon Smith. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoKyle FlanaganKnights logoSandon Smith
Tries per Game0.040.04
Try Assists per Game0.300.57Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.220.87Better
Points per Game0.64.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.040.09Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.350.70Better
Offloads per Game0.090.48Better
Possessions per Game45.158.6Better
Passes per Game37.246.4Better
Run Metres per Game28.554.7Better
Metres Gained per Game186.4317.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.110.2Better
Runs per Game4.17.9Better
Metres per Run6.896.95Better
Metres per Hit-Up
Tackles per Game18.3Better15.3
Tackle Efficiency90.1Better78.6
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.08Better0.19
Conversion Accuracy80.0Better71.9
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0Better83.3
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.010.01
Kicks per Game4.57.3Better
Kick Metres per Game157.9262.9Better
Games played2323