The verdict
Kyle Flanagan has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Kyle Flanagan leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonKyle Flanagan52%of decided measures5measures wonLuke Metcalf
Games played: 23 for Kyle Flanagan, 10 for Luke Metcalf. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kyle Flanagan |  Luke Metcalf |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.20Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30Better | 0.10 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.22Better | 0.20 |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.10Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.35 | 0.50Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.09Better | 0.00 |
| Possessions per Game | 45.1Better | 13.5 |
| Passes per Game | 37.2Better | 8.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 28.5Better | 19.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 186.4Better | 113.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 6.1Better | 4.7 |
| Runs per Game | 4.1Better | 2.1 |
| Metres per Run | 6.89 | 9.19Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 18.3Better | 5.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.1Better | 86.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.10 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 80.0Better | 75.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Kicks per Game | 4.5Better | 2.8 |
| Kick Metres per Game | 157.9Better | 94.0 |
| Games played | 23 | 10 |