The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonKurtis Morrin16%of decided measures11measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 22 for Kurtis Morrin, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kurtis Morrin |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.32Better | 0.24 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.09Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.09Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23Better | 0.19 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.05Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.45 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.4Better | 13.1 |
| Passes per Game | 4.4Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 65.1 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 66.8 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 23.9 | 31.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.5 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.66 | 8.17Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.05 | 8.53Better |
| Tackles per Game | 24.6 | 33.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 87.5 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 22 | 21 |