The verdict
Kurt Capewell has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Kurt Capewell leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonKurt Capewell16%of decided measures8measures wonNoah Martin
Games played: 13 for Kurt Capewell, 11 for Noah Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kurt Capewell |  Noah Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.15 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.23Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 1.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.00 | 2.18Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62Better | 0.18 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.0Better | 10.6 |
| Passes per Game | 3.0Better | 2.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 76.2Better | 70.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 80.5Better | 70.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 29.2Better | 26.8 |
| Runs per Game | 9.2Better | 8.1 |
| Metres per Run | 8.32 | 8.65Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.67Better | 7.80 |
| Tackles per Game | 29.8 | 39.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 90.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 13 | 11 |