The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonKai Pearce-Paul26%of decided measures12measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kai Pearce-Paul |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.24 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.83 | 0.86Better |
| Offloads per Game | 2.33Better | 0.90 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.2 | 13.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.7Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 68.2 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 69.2 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 24.6 | 31.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.8 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.72 | 8.17Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.79 | 8.53Better |
| Tackles per Game | 35.6Better | 33.2 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.4 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 12 | 21 |