The verdict
Kai Pearce-Paul has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Kai Pearce-Paul leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonKai Pearce-Paul5%of decided measures9measures wonTyson Frizell
Games played: 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul, 21 for Tyson Frizell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kai Pearce-Paul |  Tyson Frizell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.33Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 1.3Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.83Better | 0.76 |
| Offloads per Game | 2.33Better | 0.81 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.2Better | 11.2 |
| Passes per Game | 2.7Better | 2.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 68.2 | 80.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 69.2 | 81.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 24.6 | 31.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.8 | 8.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.72 | 9.04Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.79 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 35.6Better | 24.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.4 | 93.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 12 | 21 |